Wednesday, June 4, 2008

Hovnanian and Toll Post Steep Losses, Plead For Help From Congress

Hovnanian lost $5.49 a share, or $340.7 million in the second quarter. Hovnanian's losses included $250 million in land-related pretax charges. This means the company only lost around $90 million selling houses. The earnings report was littered with a bevy of minuses including a 30% drop in revenue, a decline in the average price of homes sold of 16.50%, and a 39% decline in net completed contracts. This is the seventh consecutive quarter in which Hovnanian has posted a loss.
Meanwhile, in luxury homebuilder land, Toll reported a loss of $97 million or 59 cents a share. Although the bulk of Toll's losses were related to charges against its inventory of land (they actually made $81 million selling houses), net contracts dropped by 58% from a year ago.  Frankly, I could care less if these numbers met or exceeded analysts estimates.  They are still losing gobs of money, writing down inventory, and seeing steep declines in contracts signed.  When that stabilizes, call me.  Otherwise, I remain a bear on the homebuilders.
In a conference call with analysts, Toll stated that Congress should offer would-be homebuyers a tax incentive to buy a new home, claiming that this should be a much larger priority than bailing out mortgage lenders and homeowners currently facing foreclosure. It you set aside the the fact that it is an obvious self-interested plea for help from Congress, it is an interesting idea, although I would present a different twist. It is true that home prices will never hit bottom until the enormous inventory build-up is reduced, particularly in areas where a significant number of homes on the market are foreclosed properties. What I would suggest to Congress is that they offer a tax incentive for purchases of foreclosed properties. This would give potential homebuyers as well as investors an incentive to clean up the backlog of foreclosed properties. The incentives would be skewed to more credit-worthy homebuyers and liquid investors (presumably because you can no longer get a loan otherwise), thus rewarding prudence, rather than the foolhardy spending of the bubble years. Maybe then, when the cheaper alternatives disappear, people will return to the new home market to buy a home from the homebuilders. That is, of course, assuming they're still around...

1 comment:

Huckleberry said...

Nice idea... but Congress isn't going to win any points, i.e. votes, for encouraging lenders to kick more helpless, vicitimized, unfortunate, undocumented income, didn't read the contract or do the math homeowners to the curb so the cash rich, financial elite, top .1% income earners can gobble up neighborhoods (though, why would you want 25 houses in Antioch anyway). Besides, there probably aren't enough liquid buyers to make a dent in the backlog anyway.

Since we are asking for what is in our own best interest, a la Toll, how about a tax deduction for not going into foreclosure and making payments on time. I'm still bent for not getting my stipend from Uncle Sam last month, how bout letting me deduct 2 X the interest I paid last year on my mortgage? Maybe that will attract worthy credit risk buyers to the homeowner world.