- Joseph Cassano, who led the division of American International Group Inc. responsible for the mortgage trades that proved the insurer's downfall, on Wednesday staunchly defended his actions, maintaining he made "prudent" decisions and that American taxpayers would have been better off had he stayed on.
- AIG's problems, he said, were brought on by a liquidity crisis when credit markets seized up— and weren't a result of lax underwriting practices or defaults among mortgage assets his unit had insured.
- "I think I would have negotiated a much better deal for the taxpayer than what the taxpayer got"
- Mr. Cassano said things might have turned out differently, had he not been asked to leave AIG.
- Mr. Cassano did not hesitate to parcel blame and responsibility elsewhere. He said he still disagrees with the decision by AIG's outside auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers, to disallow an accounting adjustment that made his unit's reported losses from derivatives look smaller. "I still believe now that it was a wholly appropriate adjustment," his testimony said. The accounting firm declined to comment, saying it does not comment on client matters.
He didn't cause any of these problems. But still, he would've handled the clean-up way better from all those problems he never caused to begin with. The market was wrong, the auditors were wrong, the government was wrong, Goldman Sachs was wrong. All those margin calls? Meaningless! My marks were right. I'm never wrong about anything! EVER! Somebody should give me a cape. Oh, and build a statue of me too. Several statues. Like that guy who used to run Uzbekistan. No wait, maybe its Turkmenistan? One of the Stans. Anyway, you know what I mean. I'm a friggin hero!
3 comments:
I am agree with you 100%
James
I agree with you
These people are insane
Post a Comment